Free payroll tools · Internal controls
Who changes it, who checks it, who releases it—and what evidence shows the check happened?
Build a practical draft around your real team size. The planner highlights incompatible actions and missing reviewers, then gives you editable control, evidence and access-review templates.
A payroll preparer and a payroll reviewer can be two roles held by one person. That still leaves self-review. Include authorized HR, finance or management participants who actually take part.
These starter examples replace the current draft. You can change every assignment; none proves the arrangement is approved.
Rebuilding replaces edited control suggestions. Download a reviewed draft first if you want to keep it.
Specify the action, timing, reviewer, secure evidence reference, backup and escalation. The suggestions are starting points for management review. They do not grant access or record an approval.
Unresolved conflicts travel with the draft. Typing an alternative does not close a finding. Arrange an authorized review, decide how to address remaining risks and retain evidence in your employer’s approved system.
An authorized source change and a separate review before release can prevent an error. A payroll-to-cash reconciliation detects differences. Assign an owner and due point for each difference so it does not become a permanent reconciling item.
A second role title is not a second person. Consider an authorized owner, finance partner or external reviewer, a narrower access design, an independent change log and timely exception review. Management must evaluate the remaining risk; this tool cannot declare an alternative equivalent.
Two proposed names in a worksheet do not enforce a bank or payroll system’s two-person release. Configure the supported workflow, restrict conflicting access, and test that one person cannot complete both steps.
Record which period and preview version were checked, what was compared, the reviewer, the result and resolved exceptions. Link to the approved secure repository. Keep employee details, bank data, credentials and actual provider reports out of this planner.
AICPA describes SOC 1 as a service-organization examination relevant to customers’ financial-reporting controls. SOC 2 concerns the applicable Trust Services Criteria. A provider report may inform your review; its scope, period, exceptions and user responsibilities still matter. This department plan is not a SOC engagement, attestation, certification or auditor opinion.
The GAO Green Book is a federal internal-control framework, effective for fiscal year 2026. Its separation-of-duties guidance calls for alternatives when separation is impractical. NIST explains least privilege and separation of duty. The payroll workflows here are original examples to adapt—not a claim that every listed control is mandated for every organization.
Sources checked November 3, 2026. Follow your organization’s policies, actual system capabilities and qualified auditor guidance.
Organize your work · Use payroll data as a business partner · Help employees understand their pay